Follow. 2. 1)For Video streaming am planning to use Nodejs and S3 but the point is, if a video is 1. AWS: EBS vs. Elastic File Storage (EFS), Elastic Block Storage (EBS), and Simple Storage Service (S3) are AWS’s three different storage types that can be used for different types of workload needs. SG still requires the other storage systems. This requires persistent storage, that is, storage that lives beyond the lifetime of the container, pod, or node. Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service), EBS (Elastic Block Store) and EFS (Elastic. What is the difference between EBS vs EFS vs S3? The cost structure of EFS is the most straightforward. AWS EBS AWS S3; Data is stored as blocks: Data is stored as objects: Store block can size up to 16 tebibytes each (17. Naturally, you would want to back it up. Cuối cùng, Amazon S3 là một kho lưu trữ object rất hiệu quả trong việc lưu trữ số lượng lớn các bản sao lưu hoặc tệp người dùng. Cost: EFS is approximately 10 times costly than S3. Block Storage. You can preserve the EC2…Rabu, 23 November 2022. Can Lambda use EBS? Lambda can accomodate with all the services provided by AWS. The Takeaways. S. To know if EFS is the best choice, you’ll want to compare it to your other two main options, EBS and S3. また、この説明を聞いたら想像がつくと思いますが efsのほうが値段が高いです. It is simple to use. S3 vs EBS vs EFS Comparison Table. One Zone storage classes store data redundantly within a single AZ, at a 47% lower price compared to file systems using Standard storage classes, for workloads that don’t require multi-AZ resilience. Files stored within an S3 bucket can be accessed programmatically or directly from services such as AWS CloudFront. A file storage layer is needed that can share between instances and scale the platform more easily. EFS is a managed network-attached storage filer for EC2 instances based on network file system (NFS) version 4. SHARES. EBS is simple - block level storage which can be attached to an instance from same AZ, and can survive irrespective of instance life. Consider the benefits and uses of EBS vs. AWS Storage Gateway is a hybrid cloud storage service that gives you on-premises access to virtually unlimited cloud storage. VPNs work by creating an IP. December 8, 2022 by Chris Contents hide 1 Amazon S3 1. However, just because you can doesn’t mean you should. S3 is an object store, meaning it is a higher layer data storage system, essentially it is a database "blob" storage, storing data in an underlying simple database as an object. Firstly, let’s remind ourselves about S3 and EFS. 2. AWS EFS is also called AWS Elastic File System. 1. How does Amazon S3 compare to Amazon EBS vs. S3 vs EBS vs EFS. The system shrinks and grows when you remove or add files. The full form of Amazon EFS is Amazon Elastic File System. EFS - EFS is a service highly associated with EC2, much like EBS. Para unidades de almacenamiento EC2. Finally, Amazon S3 is an object store good at storing vast numbers of backups or user files. At the beginning of a 31-day month, your file system stores 1 TB of files on EFS Standard. There are many more article explaining to this and different types of topics and services, please take a look in the channel AWS Community Builders Channel. Instance Store is a low-cost option for temporary storage that provides high-speed access, but is not suitable for persistent storage. To take a snapshot, go to the AWS EC2 console and select Volumes, then identify the volume whose snapshot is to be taken by noting the EC2 instance ID in the Attachment Information area. EBS is for EC2 block storage. More comprehensive metadata labels makes querying easier. Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP, OpenZFS, Windows File Server, and Lustre. At present the price for AWS Transfer Family for SFTP, FTPS, and FTP is the same for all protocols:Before looking at Amazon EBS vs S3, Amazon EFS vs S3, and Amazon EBS vs EFS, let’s get to know them a little better. S3的主要特点是数据的高持久性、可用性和安全性，以及灵活的存储桶概念和可配置的数据访问控制。 EBS，即Elastic Block Store弹性块存储，是AWS提供的块存储服务。EBS是一块持久化存储设备，可以像磁盘一样被挂载到具体的EC2实例上，以提供持久化存. この機能は、 AWS が公開している amazon -efs-utilsというパッケージを導入することで使うことができます。. Let’s take a closer look at the main features of each option, as well as the similarities and differences. Source: msp360. 2% per year), so you need to use. Then compare S3, EBS, HDFS, EFS. Understand the difference between EBS vs S3 vs EFS. I was wondering if the opposite workflow is possible, such that, a file uploaded to a given EFS directory would trigger Lambda to upload that file to S3? For instance, in the serverless. The question is, which one?It often comes down to use case, but the good news is that these three services are different enough from each other that, on. . However, interesting difference is between EFS and S3, and to identify proper use cases for it. Add a comment. Elastic File System (EFS). EBS stands for Elastic Block Store and is a block-level storage option for use with Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) instances. S3 is an object storage system, designed to provide archiving and data control options. Next, click on the correct Volume ID and select Create Snapshot. the old plugin documentation used to say that docker could use "any network attached block storage device", and back then I used flocker with ceph. Consuming volumes from an EC2 EBS disk ties the container to a specific AZ; Consuming volumes from an EFS file system allows you to work cross-AZ; Interestingly, these stateless vs. 03. -4. Of these services, the first three are the most relevant and frequently used as Glacier is meant only for the cold storage of archive data. Using an EFS file system, you can configure instances to mount the file system. EFS, EBS, and S3 are AWS’ three different storage types that are applicable for different types of workload needs. t u t o r i a l sd o j o . Scalable up to 300 requests every second. Data at this scale cannot be stored on a single EC2 instance allowed in EBS—requiring users to break up data and distribute it between EBS instances. At the same time, EBS is a block-level storage service optimized for low-latency, high-throughput workloads that require fast access to persistent storage. While it is important to consider the cost of storage, storage service SLA. for Linux EFS and S3 would be fine, S3 would be a lot cheaper. AWS storage types across file, block and object-- including Simple Storage Service (S3), FSx, Elastic File System (EFS) and Elastic Block Store (EBS) -- vary sharply by features, management and performance. The AWS Elastic File System (EFS) is one of Amazon’s three primary storage solutions. With a single API call, EBS can be scaled up or down. The cost structure of EFS is the most straightforward. EFS is a lot slower than EBS and about 5x the cost per GB of standard S3. As EBS storage is attached to the EC2 instance and is only accessible via that instance in the particular AWS region, it offers less latency than S3 which is accessed via the internet. Más rápido que S3 y EFS. 10 per GB for. 2. EBS Volume. AWS storage services are essential. Basic object storage that makes data available through an Internet accessible API. Provision EFS File System Configuring Firewalls For EFS Access Shared File Access across Multiple Instances. Quite clearly, the best use-case would be Amazon EFS since it is designed as a filesystem that can be mounted across multiple Amazon EC2 volumes, across multiple Availability Zones. S3 is highly scalable, available, affordable, secure, durable, and simple to use through a web-based interface, the Amazon S3 Console. Each has its own strength and purpose. East (Ohio) region, which is largely representative of AWS pricing across the board. It seems to be the cheapest. 229. , random access files for an RDBMS) or used by an. The differences in monthly charges for similar amounts of S3 and EBS with provisioned I/O storage can be substantial. EBS: EBS offers dedicated storage volumes that are attached to a single EC2 instance. 10. EBS is block, EFS is file, S3 is object. →最大数千の ec2 インスタンスからの同時アクセスが可能. In this blog, we will discuss EFS, EBS, and S3, and on the basis of that, we will compare these three storage types offered by AWS. ebsのなかのプロビジョンドiops ssd (io1またはio2)は ebsマルチア. pem. However, Amazon S3 can also offer these advantages, but it cannot be accessed like a traditional disk. It uses cryptography to guarantee the confidentiality and integrity of your data. EFS vs. From: EBS vs EFS vs S3 - When to Use AWS’ Three Storage Solutions: "EBS is a block storage service, which means all data within EBS is stored in equally sized blocks. The deciding factor between AWS storage options most likely comes down to how much you can afford to pay for storage performance that fits your needs. Amazon Glacier - Low-cost storage service that provides secure and durable storage for data archiving and backup. Efficiency. EFS is a file storage service for use with Amazon compute (EC2, containers, serverless) and on-premises servers. Amazon S3 is a cost-effective storage service, and it provides different storage classes that offer different levels of durability, availability, and retrieval times. Generally speaking, EBS should be used for persistent and fast storage for EC2 instances, such as boot volumes, databases, or logs. Amazon Glacier. EBS and EFS can be much more suitable for random-access data but cost 3 to 10 times more per gigabyte (see the table above). Up to 7k files system operations every second. 60/month in S3. gp2 has IO bursts (up to 3000 IOPS) and IO credits (5. EBS(Elastic block storage) is a block-level storage service provided by Amazon and it is basically designed. EBS is the default AWS storage type for hosting EC2 virtual hard disks, but it can be for any high-performance workload in the cloud. Discover the use cases where S3 shines, including backup and restore, content distribution, and data archiving. Amazon offers several storage services depending on your needs━Elastic Block Storage (EBS) Elastic File System (EFS), Simple Storage Service (S3), Glacier and Storage Gateway. EBS and EFS are faster than S3 as these are directly mounted on EC2. It is a backup program that is fast, efficient and secure. Amazon Route 53. Glacier and more — mainly in terms of durability and availability. This comparison of the three systems will go in-depth and give you the tools to identify the optimal storage option for you. It provides low-latency performance by caching. Now, I need an object storage service for my app, and my options are: Amazon S3 : It sounds to me like the best option but the most expensive. efsはnas に似たファイルストレージ. The below tables shows the difference of EFS, EBS, and instance store on basis of. Here, we compare Amazon EFS to. ) Block storage for an EC2 instance: File system storage for multiple EC2. EBS provides block-level storage volumes that are attached to EC2 instances. So if i use AWS EFS or EBS there wont be any necessity for the API call to S3. Amazon AWS has termed it as S3 storage while Microsoft Azure storage calls its offering as blob storage. Overall, S3 is best suited for storing large amounts of unstructured data, EBS is best for use with EC2 instances as storage, and EFS is best for file storage and sharing among multiple EC2 instances or ECS containers. EBS, EFS, FSx, and S3 are all storage solutions offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS). EBS vs EFS vs Instance Store. Provide the Bucket, key, and Body and use the "putObject" method to upload the file in a single part. 참고 자료 : AWS doc , redhat 사실. S3 is also much better for public files like images, videos, HTML/CSS files, and other web resources that are. The main difference between EBS and EFS is that EBS is only accessible from a single EC2 instance in your particular AWS region, while EFS allows you to mount the file system across multiple regions and instances. Go into the exam with architectural scenarios which fit and are anti. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Amazon S3 Glacier writes "A cost-effective solution to reduce storage. EBS vs. Update the S3 Glacier vault policy to allow. Monitor and manage snapshot security. Each Amazon EC2 instance should have a drive with system information. Each has its own strength and purpose. Of these services, the first three are the most relevant and frequently used as Glacier is meant only for the cold storage of archive data and. Comparing EBS vs. 6, while Amazon S3 is rated 8. How is the answer - "Cost of test file storage on S3 Standard < Cost of test file storage on EFS < Cost of test file storage on EBS". 1 Answer. BDRSuite provides support for using Blob data (Azure) or S3 (AWS). The key difference is that EBS is elastic (easily scalable and extensible) compared to a. 30 for EFS. Both solutions are designed to deliver high performance, however, when choosing to use network file systems consider the access patterns. It connects to AWS storage services, such as Amazon S3, Amazon Glacier, and Amazon EBS, providing storage for files, volumes, and virtual tapes in AWS. With Amazon EFS, you can create a file system, mount the file system on an Amazon EC2 instance, and then read and write data to and from your file system. In this article, I would discuss i) comparison of model training with EFS vs S3, and ii) steps to migrate from S3 to EFS and use EFS as the input data store for model training on SageMaker. 3) Content management system and web server support. S. Well, before we compare them and see their differences, let’s open those three letters acronyms. Data on S3 is served over HTTP (s) to your machines. Here are the key features and architectural benefits of each one: Amazon EBS . It does not attach via a VPC, so Security Groups are not available. AWS storage choice for file system S3 or EFS? 3. Additionally, EFS volumes are POSIX compatible, which means they will interoperate with legacy systems. Configure a VPC gateway endpoint for Amazon S3 within the VPC. File system access is via the NFS protocol. Storage cost is based on the average storage used through the month. With EBS, you need to pay for. awsの中では、s3,ebs,efsの3つのタイプのストレージがよく使われています。aws初心者の方は、違いや利用シーンについて疑問を持つかもしれません。 ストレージタイプについて. Faster than S3 and EFS. As EBS storage is attached to the EC2 instance and is only accessible via that instance in the particular AWS region, it offers less latency than S3 which is accessed via the internet. S3 vs EBS vs EFS Comparison. Amazon EBS. Amazon Glacier. EBS. See: Amazon EBS volume types - Amazon. East (N. This chart lists the basic S3 storage costs in the U. AWS S3. Create a bucket policy that limits access to only the application tier running in the VPC. If you enjoyed this content, please lets us know in the comments section below. Amazon Elastic File System（EFS）を使ううえでの勘所 - Qiita. This video AWS Storage - S3 vs EBS vs EFS Comparison is designed to teach you the storage options on the AWS platform. AWS EFS. is an object store with a simple key, value store design, and good at storing vast numbers of backups or user files. Any solution that uses S3 for storage is not a true filesystem because it merely 'presents' S3 as a filesystem, which it is not. Again, EFS has the greater flexibility and is charged only based on the used storage, unlike EBS that ResourcesEFS is the solution that Amazon suggests in it’s reference architecture for WordPress. EBS. Conclusion. A. When deciding if you should be using file, object, or block storage for your cloud application deployment, there are many factors to consider. To set up persistent storage in Amazon EKS, use either of the following options: Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) Container Storage Interface (CSI) driver. com . AWS gives us three different storage services – EBS, EFS and S3. Go to EFS from the main console and give a name for your EFS file system (optional)What are the Difference between EBS vs EFS vs FSx vs S3. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is rated 8. Scaling AWS EFS does not disrupt applications. Share Tweet. The differences in monthly charges for similar amounts of S3 and EBS with provisioned I/O storage can be substantial. It supports various volume types (gp2,io1,. The top reviewer of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) writes "A solution with good technical support that needs to improve its stability". As mentioned EFS needs to be mounted onto something, but assuming that’s an EC2 instance then uploading data into EC2 from the internet is also free. In this article, we will take a look at these three services and also discuss some use cases for these services. No tienes acceso a esta clase. S. Here are the key features and. The same sized EFS standard share would cost an additional $307 -- or about 21% more with backup and 103% more without backup -- than FSx for Windows. 📈 Can have thousands of concurrent NFS clients and can grow to Petabytes scale. Object: S3, Glacier. Good for storing backups. You can mount these volumes as devices on your instances. The service, often incorrectly referred to as Elastic Block Storage, provides highly available block-level storage volumes for use with Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) instances. S3 is highly scalable, available, affordable, secure, durable, and simple to use through a web-based interface, the Amazon S3 Console. The scenario requires an NFS-based storage solution for an application server. When running stateful applications using Kubernetes, state needs to be persisted regardless of container, pod, or node crashes or terminations. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. AWS DataSync also supports data movement between FSx for ONTAP shares and other AWS services, including other services in the FSx family, Amazon EFS, and Amazon S3. Amazon EBS vs EFS vs S3: Picking the Best AWS Storage Option for Your Business. Amazon EBS can deliver performance for workloads that require the lowest-latency access to data from a single EC2 instance. Overview. In summary, EBS offers block-level storage for EC2 instances, EFS provides a scalable file system for shared access, and S3 is an object storage service for storing and retrieving any. What is the difference between Amazon EBS Vs EFS Vs S3? Amazon EFS, Amazon EBS, and Amazon S3 are three different types of AWS storage that can be applied to different types of workload needs. For small data sizes, there may be some bandwidth allocation that AWS does that slows things way down. Amazon Web Services (AWS) offers various…S3 vs EBS vs EFS. Please do follow the steps given below. S3 is great for static files where EBS/EFS are more intended for files that are frequently modified. Updated: September 2023. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the differences between the three and how to choose the right service for your use-case. Comparing EBS vs. . Storage Type: AWS S3 is object storage while Amazon EBS is block storage and Amazon EFS is file storage. $0. AWS S3 vs EBS vs EFS: Quick Comparison. Web and file system interface. 9. Is meant to be EC2 drive. Amazon EBS is a block level storage service for use with Amazon EC2. An administrator runs a highly available application in AWS. RDS / Aurora - Know how each RDS database. AWS EFS is a file system typically used for data analysis and lift-and-shift migration. EFS is cheaper than FSx. 0. Snapshots capture only data that has been saved to an EBS volume at the. S3 organizes data in a hierarchy with metadata and it allows to run more complex queries on objects compared to EBS and EFS. Unlike DIY NFS implementations that might use one or more EC2 instances with Elastic Block Store (EBS) volumes as an NFS server, EFS is distributed across servers that span several. When you launch an instance, the root device volume. If you aren't worried too much about the speed of the drive, it is a good way to share data between computers. 03. The three key file storage services AWS provides are similar, but different. This is. EFS stands for Elastic File System and is a file-level storage option for use with AWS. With EBS you are also paying for I/O ops while the volume is mounted. Amazon S3. AWS EBS is a block storage service typically used as persistent storage for Amazon EC2 instances. S3 stands for Simple Storage Service, and EBS for Elastic Block Store. An AMI supplies a storage image, which a new EC2 instance requires at launch. Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) is a set-and-forget, serverless, simple elastic file system that can be used with on-premises resources and AWS Cloud services. Store the data in an Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) file system. EBS and EFS are both faster than Amazon S3, with high IOPS and lower latency. EFS is useful for Content Management Systems (CMS) and Software as s Service (SaaS) apps. Simple Storage Service – S3. There are a lot of differences when it comes to comparing in Amazon EFS vs. Now you can connect to the ec2 instance through the CLI by typing: ssh ec2-user@34. S3 provides features like versioning, lifecycle management, event notifications, and fine-grained access control, allowing you to manage your data effectively. S3 is the external hard drive on the side. Para almacenar copias de seguridad y otros datos estáticos. The term data persistence means that the data itself outlasts the. 1 protocols. is an object store with a simple key, value store design, and good at storing vast numbers of backups or user files. The Takeaways. 이 두 스토리지 시스템의 특징과 어느 상황에서 각 서비스를 사용해야 하는지 알아보자. 1 vs . Slower than EBS and EFS. An administrator runs a highly available application in AWS. EBS can only be used by one EC2 instance at a time while S3 can be used by multiple instances. We have been observing them for more than a decade now. Amazon’s Simple Storage Service (S3) is one of the more commonly used AWS services for storage purposes. S3 vs EBS vs EFS Comparision. Entire data is stored in fixed-size blocks that have unique addresses. PC or Laptop with internet Connection. It is a scalable, cloud-based file system supporting Linux-based applications and workloads that can work in tandem with. West (Oregon), U. As mentioned EFS needs to be mounted onto something, but assuming that’s an EC2 instance then uploading data into EC2 from the internet is also free. Storage Gateway. Amazon EFS? EBS is the high-availability storage volume for EC2 instances at the block level. Amazon S3 can scale to store any amount of data, and it can handle millions of requests per second. Storage volumes can only connect to a single EC2 instance at a time, which enables quick file access. 1 Answer. Back in 2016, we first launched File Gateway, a gateway type of the hybrid cloud storage service AWS Storage Gateway. Vote. EBS is block-level storage designed for Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) instances. EBS vs EFS. 1 instance at a time locked in 1 AZ. S. 30 per GB-month; Infrequent access storage: $0. EBS : AWS Elastic Block Store S3 : Simple Storage Service EFS : Elastic File System. S3 (simple storage service) is the most used storage type in AWS. 8. Curso Práctico de Storage en AWS. Block Storage vs. S3 is also much better for public files like images, videos, HTML/CSS files, and other web resources that are. Các tệp được lưu trữ trong S3 bucket có thể được truy cập bằng code hoặc trực. (Learn more about EBS storage type in our comparison of Amazon S3 vs EBS vs EFS. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is ranked 3rd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 5 reviews while Amazon S3 Glacier is ranked 6th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 11 reviews. . With io1 you get to specify IOPS capabilities (S3 has no user specified performance control). This video AWS Storage - S3 vs EBS vs EFS Comparison is designed to teach you the storage options on the AWS platform. If you were to run a database on EC2 then you would use EBS to store the data. EBS can accommodate a smaller amount of data than S3. In a physical environment this volume might be coming from storage or a server. EBS volumes support full-volume encryption. Example: How Alpha Vertex uses EFS. In summary, the choice between Amazon EBS, Amazon EFS, Amazon FSx, and Amazon S3 depends on your specific use case, performance requirements, and storage characteristics. EFS is an elastic serverless file system that users can share across multiple resources and systems,. Amazon Machine Images. Amazon Simple Storage Service. EFS Systems. EBS. 025 per. AWS currently offers the following storage services: Instance/Ephemeral Storage. For example Glacier, S3, EFS allocates the storage for you based on your usage, while at EBS you need to predefine the allocated storage. Chose Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) S3 and EBS/EFS both host files, but they are very different. 742,673 professionals have used our research since 2012. Amazon EFS file systems are distributed across an unconstrained number of storage servers, enabling file systems to grow elastically and allowing massively parallel access from EC2 instances. NFSv4. AMAZON STORAGE SERVICES: AWS provides wide range storage services that can be used accordingly to. EBS vs EFS vs FSx vs S3 opens up Pandora's box when choosing the right data storage option. With some code changes, Amazon S3 is actually a very good choice. AWS Snapshots for Amazon EBS volumes provide AWS users with a way to create backup copies of the data. 52 TB max for individual files. In this Ec2 instance use the key created in Step 2 and the security group which has been created in Step 1. pem. EFS is a Network Filesystem (NFS). To do this when creating a file system using the console, choose Availability and Durability, and then choose One Zone. EFS is ideal for applications that require a file system, such as media files, while EBS is better suited for. EBS is an umbrella term for all AWS block-level data storage services, which provides storage directly on AWS elastic cloud compute ( EC2 ). Using an EFS file system, you can configure instances to mount the file system. Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) is a scalable, high-performance object storage service that is designed for storing large amounts of unstructured data, such as videos, images, audio files, and backups. Configure AWS Backup to back up and retain copies of the data for 1 year. What is the difference between EBS vs EFS vs S3? The cost structure of EFS is the most straightforward. It scales transparently behind the scenes. 30 per GB for EFS vs. Amazon EBS is designed to store data in blocks (volumes of a provisioned size) attached to an Amazon EC2 instance, similar to a local disk drive on your physical machine. In the end, the deciding factor between Amazon EBS vs. AWS Storage Summed Up. You can back up the data on your Amazon EBS volumes to Amazon S3 by taking point-in-time snapshots. Stateful applications rely on data being persisted and retrieved to run properly. feels like performance story is not quite there with EFS. AWS EFS Overview. Some RDS older instances have local storage, most use EBS only. 30 GB-month ($6. Điều này sẽ giúp bạn. . 1. IMPORTANT AWS STORAGE TYPES AND THEIR DIFFERENCES: EBS VS EFS VS S3 S3: SIMPLE STORAGE SERVICE is an object storage service. What are the Difference between EBS vs EFS vs FSx vs S3 EBS, EFS, FSx, and S3 are all storage solutions offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS). EBS can only be used with EC2 instances at a time, while S3 can be used outside EC2 multiple times. While EFS is a managed elastic file system designed for use across different machines and availability zones, EBS is designed as a fast and reliable block storage volume for single machines (although EBS multi-attach is an exception to this that applies only on very specialized scenarios). EFS is file system storage, using NFSv4 protocol. Block (volumes): Amazon EBS, EC2 Instance Store. この機能は、 AWS が公開している amazon -efs-utilsというパッケージを導入することで使うことができます。. When deciding if you should be using file, object, or block storage for your cloud application deployment, there are many factors to consider. Understanding the Differences. That is still the standard way to use it (as per storage), but in special cases, Amazon EBS Multi-Attach can convert EBS into multi-item storage, such as EFS. Amazon S3 vs EBS vs EFS In this Amazon S3 vs EBS vs EFS, we will discuss the differences between Amazon S3, EBS, and EFS. offers pay for the. If you enjoyed this content, please lets us know in the comments. S3-Versioning. AWS gives us three different storage services – EBS, EFS and S3. EBS snapshots vs. EFS is $0. 3.